Iran vs Mauritania: Universal right to vote
Iran
2
in 2025
Mauritania
2
in 2025
Iran rank
1st
Mauritania rank
1st
Universal right to vote over time
- Iran
- Mauritania
How they compare
Iran currently reports 2 against 2 in Mauritania, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 122 shared years of data; in 1904 it was Mauritania ahead.
Iran ranks 1st and Mauritania ranks 1st of 198 countries.
Across the 13 decades both report, Iran averaged higher in 5 and Mauritania in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Iran | Mauritania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1900s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1910s | 0.6 | 0 | 0.6 | Iran |
| 1920s | 1 | 0 | 1 | Iran |
| 1930s | 1 | 0 | 1 | Iran |
| 1940s | 1 | 0 | 1 | Iran |
| 1950s | 1 | 0.6 | 0.4 | Iran |
| 1960s | 1.7 | 2 | 0.3 | Mauritania |
| 1970s | 2 | 2 | 0 | — |
| 1980s | 2 | 2 | 0 | — |
| 1990s | 2 | 2 | 0 | — |
| 2000s | 2 | 2 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 2 | 2 | 0 | — |
| 2020s | 2 | 2 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher universal right to vote, Iran or Mauritania?
- Iran, at 2 against 2 in Mauritania as of 2025.
- What is the difference in universal right to vote between Iran and Mauritania?
- 0, with Iran ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Iran and Mauritania?
- 122 years are reported by both, from 1904 to 2025.
- How do Iran and Mauritania rank globally for universal right to vote?
- Iran ranks 1st and Mauritania ranks 1st of 198 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Universal right to vote. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Indicates whether virtually all men and women that are citizens are allowed to vote in national elections (score 2), whether it is only men (score 1), or there is no universal rights to vote for either men or women (score 0). It neither considers informal restrictions nor legal restrictions based on age, criminal conviction, disability, and local residency.