Jordan vs Marshall Islands: Universal right to vote
Universal right to vote over time
- Jordan
- Marshall Islands
How they compare
Jordan currently reports 2 against 2 in Marshall Islands, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 104 shared years of data; in 1922 it was Marshall Islands ahead.
Jordan ranks 1st and Marshall Islands ranks 1st of 198 countries.
Across the 11 decades both report, Jordan averaged higher in 1 and Marshall Islands in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Jordan | Marshall Islands | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1920s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1930s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1940s | 0.3 | 0 | 0.3 | Jordan |
| 1950s | 1 | 2 | 1 | Marshall Islands |
| 1960s | 1 | 2 | 1 | Marshall Islands |
| 1970s | 1.6 | 2 | 0.4 | Marshall Islands |
| 1980s | 2 | 2 | 0 | — |
| 1990s | 2 | 2 | 0 | — |
| 2000s | 2 | 2 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 2 | 2 | 0 | — |
| 2020s | 2 | 2 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher universal right to vote, Jordan or Marshall Islands?
- Jordan, at 2 against 2 in Marshall Islands as of 2025.
- What is the difference in universal right to vote between Jordan and Marshall Islands?
- 0, with Jordan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Jordan and Marshall Islands?
- 104 years are reported by both, from 1922 to 2025.
- How do Jordan and Marshall Islands rank globally for universal right to vote?
- Jordan ranks 1st and Marshall Islands ranks 1st of 198 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Universal right to vote. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Indicates whether virtually all men and women that are citizens are allowed to vote in national elections (score 2), whether it is only men (score 1), or there is no universal rights to vote for either men or women (score 0). It neither considers informal restrictions nor legal restrictions based on age, criminal conviction, disability, and local residency.