Kiribati vs Spain: Universal right to vote
Kiribati
2
in 2025
Spain
2
in 2025
Kiribati rank
1st
Spain rank
1st
Universal right to vote over time
- Kiribati
- Spain
How they compare
Kiribati currently reports 2 against 2 in Spain, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 134 shared years of data; in 1892 it was Spain ahead.
Kiribati ranks 1st and Spain ranks 1st of 198 countries.
Across the 14 decades both report, Kiribati averaged higher in 2 and Spain in 5.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kiribati | Spain | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1890s | 0 | 1 | 1 | Spain |
| 1900s | 0 | 1 | 1 | Spain |
| 1910s | 0 | 1 | 1 | Spain |
| 1920s | 0 | 1 | 1 | Spain |
| 1930s | 0 | 1.7 | 1.7 | Spain |
| 1940s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1950s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1960s | 1.2 | 0 | 1.2 | Kiribati |
| 1970s | 2 | 0.8 | 1.2 | Kiribati |
| 1980s | 2 | 2 | 0 | — |
| 1990s | 2 | 2 | 0 | — |
| 2000s | 2 | 2 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 2 | 2 | 0 | — |
| 2020s | 2 | 2 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher universal right to vote, Kiribati or Spain?
- Kiribati, at 2 against 2 in Spain as of 2025.
- What is the difference in universal right to vote between Kiribati and Spain?
- 0, with Kiribati ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kiribati and Spain?
- 134 years are reported by both, from 1892 to 2025.
- How do Kiribati and Spain rank globally for universal right to vote?
- Kiribati ranks 1st and Spain ranks 1st of 198 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Universal right to vote. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Indicates whether virtually all men and women that are citizens are allowed to vote in national elections (score 2), whether it is only men (score 1), or there is no universal rights to vote for either men or women (score 0). It neither considers informal restrictions nor legal restrictions based on age, criminal conviction, disability, and local residency.