North Korea vs San Marino: Universal right to vote
North Korea
2
in 2025
San Marino
2
in 2025
North Korea rank
1st
San Marino rank
1st
Universal right to vote over time
- North Korea
- San Marino
How they compare
North Korea currently reports 2 against 2 in San Marino, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 78 shared years of data; in 1948 it was North Korea ahead.
North Korea ranks 1st and San Marino ranks 1st of 198 countries.
North Korea has averaged higher in every one of the 9 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | North Korea | San Marino | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1940s | 2 | 1 | 1 | North Korea |
| 1950s | 2 | 1.3 | 0.7 | North Korea |
| 1960s | 2 | 2 | 0 | — |
| 1970s | 2 | 2 | 0 | — |
| 1980s | 2 | 2 | 0 | — |
| 1990s | 2 | 2 | 0 | — |
| 2000s | 2 | 2 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 2 | 2 | 0 | — |
| 2020s | 2 | 2 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher universal right to vote, North Korea or San Marino?
- North Korea, at 2 against 2 in San Marino as of 2025.
- What is the difference in universal right to vote between North Korea and San Marino?
- 0, with North Korea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for North Korea and San Marino?
- 78 years are reported by both, from 1948 to 2025.
- How do North Korea and San Marino rank globally for universal right to vote?
- North Korea ranks 1st and San Marino ranks 1st of 198 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Universal right to vote. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Indicates whether virtually all men and women that are citizens are allowed to vote in national elections (score 2), whether it is only men (score 1), or there is no universal rights to vote for either men or women (score 0). It neither considers informal restrictions nor legal restrictions based on age, criminal conviction, disability, and local residency.