Moldova vs Poland: Universal right to vote
Moldova
2
in 2025
Poland
2
in 2025
Moldova rank
1st
Poland rank
1st
Universal right to vote over time
- Moldova
- Poland
How they compare
Moldova currently reports 2 against 2 in Poland, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 145 shared years of data; in 1800 it was Poland ahead.
Moldova ranks 1st and Poland ranks 1st of 198 countries.
Moldova has averaged higher in every one of the 16 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Moldova | Poland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1800s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1860s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1870s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1880s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1890s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1900s | 0.5 | 0 | 0.5 | Moldova |
| 1910s | 1.3 | 0.2 | 1.1 | Moldova |
| 1940s | 2 | 2 | 0 | — |
| 1950s | 2 | 2 | 0 | — |
| 1960s | 2 | 2 | 0 | — |
| 1970s | 2 | 2 | 0 | — |
| 1980s | 2 | 2 | 0 | — |
| 1990s | 2 | 2 | 0 | — |
| 2000s | 2 | 2 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 2 | 2 | 0 | — |
| 2020s | 2 | 2 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher universal right to vote, Moldova or Poland?
- Moldova, at 2 against 2 in Poland as of 2025.
- What is the difference in universal right to vote between Moldova and Poland?
- 0, with Moldova ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Moldova and Poland?
- 145 years are reported by both, from 1800 to 2025.
- How do Moldova and Poland rank globally for universal right to vote?
- Moldova ranks 1st and Poland ranks 1st of 198 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Universal right to vote. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Indicates whether virtually all men and women that are citizens are allowed to vote in national elections (score 2), whether it is only men (score 1), or there is no universal rights to vote for either men or women (score 0). It neither considers informal restrictions nor legal restrictions based on age, criminal conviction, disability, and local residency.