Mongolia vs Thailand: Universal right to vote
Mongolia
2
in 2025
Thailand
2
in 2025
Mongolia rank
1st
Thailand rank
1st
Universal right to vote over time
- Mongolia
- Thailand
How they compare
Mongolia currently reports 2 against 2 in Thailand, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 115 shared years of data; in 1911 it was Thailand ahead.
Mongolia ranks 1st and Thailand ranks 1st of 198 countries.
Mongolia has averaged higher in every one of the 12 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mongolia | Thailand | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1910s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1920s | 1.2 | 0 | 1.2 | Mongolia |
| 1930s | 2 | 1.6 | 0.4 | Mongolia |
| 1940s | 2 | 2 | 0 | — |
| 1950s | 2 | 2 | 0 | — |
| 1960s | 2 | 2 | 0 | — |
| 1970s | 2 | 2 | 0 | — |
| 1980s | 2 | 2 | 0 | — |
| 1990s | 2 | 2 | 0 | — |
| 2000s | 2 | 2 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 2 | 2 | 0 | — |
| 2020s | 2 | 2 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher universal right to vote, Mongolia or Thailand?
- Mongolia, at 2 against 2 in Thailand as of 2025.
- What is the difference in universal right to vote between Mongolia and Thailand?
- 0, with Mongolia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mongolia and Thailand?
- 115 years are reported by both, from 1911 to 2025.
- How do Mongolia and Thailand rank globally for universal right to vote?
- Mongolia ranks 1st and Thailand ranks 1st of 198 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Universal right to vote. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Indicates whether virtually all men and women that are citizens are allowed to vote in national elections (score 2), whether it is only men (score 1), or there is no universal rights to vote for either men or women (score 0). It neither considers informal restrictions nor legal restrictions based on age, criminal conviction, disability, and local residency.