Nauru vs Sierra Leone: Universal right to vote
Nauru
2
in 2025
Sierra Leone
2
in 2025
Nauru rank
1st
Sierra Leone rank
1st
Universal right to vote over time
- Nauru
- Sierra Leone
How they compare
Nauru currently reports 2 against 2 in Sierra Leone, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 130 shared years of data; in 1896 it was Sierra Leone ahead.
Nauru ranks 1st and Sierra Leone ranks 1st of 198 countries.
Nauru has averaged higher in every one of the 14 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Nauru | Sierra Leone | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1890s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1900s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1910s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1920s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1930s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1940s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1950s | 1.8 | 0.4 | 1.4 | Nauru |
| 1960s | 2 | 2 | 0 | — |
| 1970s | 2 | 2 | 0 | — |
| 1980s | 2 | 2 | 0 | — |
| 1990s | 2 | 2 | 0 | — |
| 2000s | 2 | 2 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 2 | 2 | 0 | — |
| 2020s | 2 | 2 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher universal right to vote, Nauru or Sierra Leone?
- Nauru, at 2 against 2 in Sierra Leone as of 2025.
- What is the difference in universal right to vote between Nauru and Sierra Leone?
- 0, with Nauru ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Nauru and Sierra Leone?
- 130 years are reported by both, from 1896 to 2025.
- How do Nauru and Sierra Leone rank globally for universal right to vote?
- Nauru ranks 1st and Sierra Leone ranks 1st of 198 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Universal right to vote. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Indicates whether virtually all men and women that are citizens are allowed to vote in national elections (score 2), whether it is only men (score 1), or there is no universal rights to vote for either men or women (score 0). It neither considers informal restrictions nor legal restrictions based on age, criminal conviction, disability, and local residency.