Nauru vs Tajikistan: Universal right to vote
Nauru
2
in 2025
Tajikistan
2
in 2025
Nauru rank
1st
Tajikistan rank
1st
Universal right to vote over time
- Nauru
- Tajikistan
How they compare
Nauru currently reports 2 against 2 in Tajikistan, a difference of 0.
Across all 138 years both countries report, Tajikistan has been ahead every year.
Nauru ranks 1st and Tajikistan ranks 1st of 198 countries.
Tajikistan has averaged higher in every one of the 15 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Nauru | Tajikistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1890s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1900s | 0 | 0.5 | 0.5 | Tajikistan |
| 1910s | 0 | 1.3 | 1.3 | Tajikistan |
| 1920s | 0 | 2 | 2 | Tajikistan |
| 1930s | 0 | 2 | 2 | Tajikistan |
| 1940s | 0 | 2 | 2 | Tajikistan |
| 1950s | 1.8 | 2 | 0.2 | Tajikistan |
| 1960s | 2 | 2 | 0 | — |
| 1970s | 2 | 2 | 0 | — |
| 1980s | 2 | 2 | 0 | — |
| 1990s | 2 | 2 | 0 | — |
| 2000s | 2 | 2 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 2 | 2 | 0 | — |
| 2020s | 2 | 2 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher universal right to vote, Nauru or Tajikistan?
- Nauru, at 2 against 2 in Tajikistan as of 2025.
- What is the difference in universal right to vote between Nauru and Tajikistan?
- 0, with Nauru ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Nauru and Tajikistan?
- 138 years are reported by both, from 1888 to 2025.
- How do Nauru and Tajikistan rank globally for universal right to vote?
- Nauru ranks 1st and Tajikistan ranks 1st of 198 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Universal right to vote. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Indicates whether virtually all men and women that are citizens are allowed to vote in national elections (score 2), whether it is only men (score 1), or there is no universal rights to vote for either men or women (score 0). It neither considers informal restrictions nor legal restrictions based on age, criminal conviction, disability, and local residency.