Rwanda vs Turkmenistan: Universal right to vote
Rwanda
2
in 2025
Turkmenistan
2
in 2025
Rwanda rank
1st
Turkmenistan rank
1st
Universal right to vote over time
- Rwanda
- Turkmenistan
How they compare
Rwanda currently reports 2 against 2 in Turkmenistan, a difference of 0.
Across all 110 years both countries report, Turkmenistan has been ahead every year.
Rwanda ranks 1st and Turkmenistan ranks 1st of 198 countries.
Turkmenistan has averaged higher in every one of the 12 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Rwanda | Turkmenistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1910s | 0 | 1.75 | 1.75 | Turkmenistan |
| 1920s | 0 | 2 | 2 | Turkmenistan |
| 1930s | 0 | 2 | 2 | Turkmenistan |
| 1940s | 0 | 2 | 2 | Turkmenistan |
| 1950s | 0 | 2 | 2 | Turkmenistan |
| 1960s | 1.8 | 2 | 0.2 | Turkmenistan |
| 1970s | 2 | 2 | 0 | — |
| 1980s | 2 | 2 | 0 | — |
| 1990s | 2 | 2 | 0 | — |
| 2000s | 2 | 2 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 2 | 2 | 0 | — |
| 2020s | 2 | 2 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher universal right to vote, Rwanda or Turkmenistan?
- Rwanda, at 2 against 2 in Turkmenistan as of 2025.
- What is the difference in universal right to vote between Rwanda and Turkmenistan?
- 0, with Rwanda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Rwanda and Turkmenistan?
- 110 years are reported by both, from 1916 to 2025.
- How do Rwanda and Turkmenistan rank globally for universal right to vote?
- Rwanda ranks 1st and Turkmenistan ranks 1st of 198 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Universal right to vote. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Indicates whether virtually all men and women that are citizens are allowed to vote in national elections (score 2), whether it is only men (score 1), or there is no universal rights to vote for either men or women (score 0). It neither considers informal restrictions nor legal restrictions based on age, criminal conviction, disability, and local residency.