Solomon Islands vs Tanzania: Universal right to vote
Solomon Islands
2
in 2025
Tanzania
2
in 2025
Solomon Islands rank
1st
Tanzania rank
1st
Universal right to vote over time
- Solomon Islands
- Tanzania
How they compare
Solomon Islands currently reports 2 against 2 in Tanzania, a difference of 0.
Across all 112 years both countries report, Tanzania has been ahead every year.
Solomon Islands ranks 1st and Tanzania ranks 1st of 198 countries.
Tanzania has averaged higher in every one of the 12 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Solomon Islands | Tanzania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1910s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1920s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1930s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1940s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1950s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1960s | 1.2 | 1.4 | 0.2 | Tanzania |
| 1970s | 2 | 2 | 0 | — |
| 1980s | 2 | 2 | 0 | — |
| 1990s | 2 | 2 | 0 | — |
| 2000s | 2 | 2 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 2 | 2 | 0 | — |
| 2020s | 2 | 2 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher universal right to vote, Solomon Islands or Tanzania?
- Solomon Islands, at 2 against 2 in Tanzania as of 2025.
- What is the difference in universal right to vote between Solomon Islands and Tanzania?
- 0, with Solomon Islands ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Solomon Islands and Tanzania?
- 112 years are reported by both, from 1914 to 2025.
- How do Solomon Islands and Tanzania rank globally for universal right to vote?
- Solomon Islands ranks 1st and Tanzania ranks 1st of 198 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Universal right to vote. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Indicates whether virtually all men and women that are citizens are allowed to vote in national elections (score 2), whether it is only men (score 1), or there is no universal rights to vote for either men or women (score 0). It neither considers informal restrictions nor legal restrictions based on age, criminal conviction, disability, and local residency.