Solomon Islands vs Vietnam: Universal right to vote
Solomon Islands
2
in 2025
Vietnam
2
in 2025
Solomon Islands rank
1st
Vietnam rank
1st
Universal right to vote over time
- Solomon Islands
- Vietnam
How they compare
Solomon Islands currently reports 2 against 2 in Vietnam, a difference of 0.
Across all 111 years both countries report, Vietnam has been ahead every year.
Solomon Islands ranks 1st and Vietnam ranks 1st of 198 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Solomon Islands | Vietnam | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1890s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1900s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1910s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1920s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1930s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1940s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1950s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1970s | 2 | 2 | 0 | — |
| 1980s | 2 | 2 | 0 | — |
| 1990s | 2 | 2 | 0 | — |
| 2000s | 2 | 2 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 2 | 2 | 0 | — |
| 2020s | 2 | 2 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher universal right to vote, Solomon Islands or Vietnam?
- Solomon Islands, at 2 against 2 in Vietnam as of 2025.
- What is the difference in universal right to vote between Solomon Islands and Vietnam?
- 0, with Solomon Islands ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Solomon Islands and Vietnam?
- 111 years are reported by both, from 1893 to 2025.
- How do Solomon Islands and Vietnam rank globally for universal right to vote?
- Solomon Islands ranks 1st and Vietnam ranks 1st of 198 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Universal right to vote. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Indicates whether virtually all men and women that are citizens are allowed to vote in national elections (score 2), whether it is only men (score 1), or there is no universal rights to vote for either men or women (score 0). It neither considers informal restrictions nor legal restrictions based on age, criminal conviction, disability, and local residency.