Sudan vs Venezuela: Universal right to vote
Sudan
2
in 2025
Venezuela
2
in 2025
Sudan rank
1st
Venezuela rank
1st
Universal right to vote over time
- Sudan
- Venezuela
How they compare
Sudan currently reports 2 against 2 in Venezuela, a difference of 0.
Across all 127 years both countries report, Venezuela has been ahead every year.
Sudan ranks 1st and Venezuela ranks 1st of 198 countries.
Venezuela has averaged higher in every one of the 14 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Sudan | Venezuela | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1890s | 0 | 1 | 1 | Venezuela |
| 1900s | 0 | 1 | 1 | Venezuela |
| 1910s | 0 | 1 | 1 | Venezuela |
| 1920s | 0 | 1 | 1 | Venezuela |
| 1930s | 0 | 0.6 | 0.6 | Venezuela |
| 1940s | 0 | 0.6 | 0.6 | Venezuela |
| 1950s | 0.7 | 2 | 1.3 | Venezuela |
| 1960s | 1.6 | 2 | 0.4 | Venezuela |
| 1970s | 2 | 2 | 0 | — |
| 1980s | 2 | 2 | 0 | — |
| 1990s | 2 | 2 | 0 | — |
| 2000s | 2 | 2 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 2 | 2 | 0 | — |
| 2020s | 2 | 2 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher universal right to vote, Sudan or Venezuela?
- Sudan, at 2 against 2 in Venezuela as of 2025.
- What is the difference in universal right to vote between Sudan and Venezuela?
- 0, with Sudan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Sudan and Venezuela?
- 127 years are reported by both, from 1899 to 2025.
- How do Sudan and Venezuela rank globally for universal right to vote?
- Sudan ranks 1st and Venezuela ranks 1st of 198 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Universal right to vote. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Indicates whether virtually all men and women that are citizens are allowed to vote in national elections (score 2), whether it is only men (score 1), or there is no universal rights to vote for either men or women (score 0). It neither considers informal restrictions nor legal restrictions based on age, criminal conviction, disability, and local residency.