Syria vs Trinidad and Tobago: Universal right to vote
Universal right to vote over time
- Syria
- Trinidad and Tobago
How they compare
Syria currently reports 2 against 2 in Trinidad and Tobago, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 108 shared years of data; in 1918 it was Trinidad and Tobago ahead.
Syria ranks 1st and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 1st of 198 countries.
Across the 12 decades both report, Syria averaged higher in 3 and Trinidad and Tobago in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Syria | Trinidad and Tobago | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1910s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1920s | 0.2 | 0 | 0.2 | Syria |
| 1930s | 1 | 0 | 1 | Syria |
| 1940s | 1 | 0.8 | 0.2 | Syria |
| 1950s | 1.7 | 2 | 0.3 | Trinidad and Tobago |
| 1960s | 2 | 2 | 0 | — |
| 1970s | 2 | 2 | 0 | — |
| 1980s | 2 | 2 | 0 | — |
| 1990s | 2 | 2 | 0 | — |
| 2000s | 2 | 2 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 2 | 2 | 0 | — |
| 2020s | 2 | 2 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher universal right to vote, Syria or Trinidad and Tobago?
- Syria, at 2 against 2 in Trinidad and Tobago as of 2025.
- What is the difference in universal right to vote between Syria and Trinidad and Tobago?
- 0, with Syria ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Syria and Trinidad and Tobago?
- 108 years are reported by both, from 1918 to 2025.
- How do Syria and Trinidad and Tobago rank globally for universal right to vote?
- Syria ranks 1st and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 1st of 198 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Universal right to vote. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Indicates whether virtually all men and women that are citizens are allowed to vote in national elections (score 2), whether it is only men (score 1), or there is no universal rights to vote for either men or women (score 0). It neither considers informal restrictions nor legal restrictions based on age, criminal conviction, disability, and local residency.