Australia vs Mauritania: Men's universal right to vote
Australia
1
in 2025
Mauritania
1
in 2025
Australia rank
1st
Mauritania rank
1st
Men's universal right to vote over time
- Australia
- Mauritania
How they compare
Australia currently reports 1 against 1 in Mauritania, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 122 shared years of data; in 1904 it was Australia ahead.
Australia ranks 1st and Mauritania ranks 1st of 198 countries.
Australia has averaged higher in every one of the 13 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia | Mauritania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1900s | 1 | 0 | 1 | Australia |
| 1910s | 1 | 0 | 1 | Australia |
| 1920s | 1 | 0 | 1 | Australia |
| 1930s | 1 | 0 | 1 | Australia |
| 1940s | 1 | 0 | 1 | Australia |
| 1950s | 1 | 0.3 | 0.7 | Australia |
| 1960s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1970s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1980s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1990s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2000s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2020s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher men's universal right to vote, Australia or Mauritania?
- Australia, at 1 against 1 in Mauritania as of 2025.
- What is the difference in men's universal right to vote between Australia and Mauritania?
- 0, with Australia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Mauritania?
- 122 years are reported by both, from 1904 to 2025.
- How do Australia and Mauritania rank globally for men's universal right to vote?
- Australia ranks 1st and Mauritania ranks 1st of 198 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Men's universal right to vote. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Indicates whether all men are allowed to vote in national elections. It neither considers informal restrictions nor legal restrictions based on age, criminal conviction, disability, and local residency.