Azerbaijan vs Cuba: Men's universal right to vote
Azerbaijan
1
in 2025
Cuba
1
in 2025
Azerbaijan rank
1st
Cuba rank
1st
Men's universal right to vote over time
- Azerbaijan
- Cuba
How they compare
Azerbaijan currently reports 1 against 1 in Cuba, a difference of 0.
Across all 213 years both countries report, Cuba has been ahead every year.
Azerbaijan ranks 1st and Cuba ranks 1st of 198 countries.
Cuba has averaged higher in every one of the 22 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Azerbaijan | Cuba | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1810s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1820s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1830s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1840s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1850s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1860s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1870s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1880s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1890s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1900s | 0.5 | 0.9 | 0.4 | Cuba |
| 1910s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1920s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1930s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1940s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1950s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1960s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1970s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1980s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1990s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2000s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2020s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher men's universal right to vote, Azerbaijan or Cuba?
- Azerbaijan, at 1 against 1 in Cuba as of 2025.
- What is the difference in men's universal right to vote between Azerbaijan and Cuba?
- 0, with Azerbaijan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Azerbaijan and Cuba?
- 213 years are reported by both, from 1813 to 2025.
- How do Azerbaijan and Cuba rank globally for men's universal right to vote?
- Azerbaijan ranks 1st and Cuba ranks 1st of 198 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Men's universal right to vote. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Indicates whether all men are allowed to vote in national elections. It neither considers informal restrictions nor legal restrictions based on age, criminal conviction, disability, and local residency.