Bahamas vs Cambodia: Men's universal right to vote
Bahamas
1
in 2025
Cambodia
1
in 2025
Bahamas rank
1st
Cambodia rank
1st
Men's universal right to vote over time
- Bahamas
- Cambodia
How they compare
Bahamas currently reports 1 against 1 in Cambodia, a difference of 0.
Across all 237 years both countries report, Cambodia has been ahead every year.
Bahamas ranks 1st and Cambodia ranks 1st of 198 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bahamas | Cambodia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1780s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1790s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1800s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1810s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1820s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1830s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1840s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1850s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1860s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1870s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1880s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1890s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1900s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1910s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1920s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1930s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1940s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1950s | 0.4 | 0.4 | 0 | — |
| 1960s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1970s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1980s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1990s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2000s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2020s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher men's universal right to vote, Bahamas or Cambodia?
- Bahamas, at 1 against 1 in Cambodia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in men's universal right to vote between Bahamas and Cambodia?
- 0, with Bahamas ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bahamas and Cambodia?
- 237 years are reported by both, from 1789 to 2025.
- How do Bahamas and Cambodia rank globally for men's universal right to vote?
- Bahamas ranks 1st and Cambodia ranks 1st of 198 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Men's universal right to vote. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Indicates whether all men are allowed to vote in national elections. It neither considers informal restrictions nor legal restrictions based on age, criminal conviction, disability, and local residency.