Barbados vs Canada: Men's universal right to vote
Barbados
1
in 2025
Canada
1
in 2025
Barbados rank
1st
Canada rank
1st
Men's universal right to vote over time
- Barbados
- Canada
How they compare
Barbados currently reports 1 against 1 in Canada, a difference of 0.
Across all 185 years both countries report, Canada has been ahead every year.
Barbados ranks 1st and Canada ranks 1st of 198 countries.
Canada has averaged higher in every one of the 19 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Barbados | Canada | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1840s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1850s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1860s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1870s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1880s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1890s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1900s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1910s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1920s | 0 | 1 | 1 | Canada |
| 1930s | 0 | 1 | 1 | Canada |
| 1940s | 0 | 1 | 1 | Canada |
| 1950s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1960s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1970s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1980s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1990s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2000s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2020s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher men's universal right to vote, Barbados or Canada?
- Barbados, at 1 against 1 in Canada as of 2025.
- What is the difference in men's universal right to vote between Barbados and Canada?
- 0, with Barbados ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Barbados and Canada?
- 185 years are reported by both, from 1841 to 2025.
- How do Barbados and Canada rank globally for men's universal right to vote?
- Barbados ranks 1st and Canada ranks 1st of 198 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Men's universal right to vote. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Indicates whether all men are allowed to vote in national elections. It neither considers informal restrictions nor legal restrictions based on age, criminal conviction, disability, and local residency.