Barbados vs Sri Lanka: Men's universal right to vote
Barbados
1
in 2025
Sri Lanka
1
in 2025
Barbados rank
1st
Sri Lanka rank
1st
Men's universal right to vote over time
- Barbados
- Sri Lanka
How they compare
Barbados currently reports 1 against 1 in Sri Lanka, a difference of 0.
Across all 187 years both countries report, Sri Lanka has been ahead every year.
Barbados ranks 1st and Sri Lanka ranks 1st of 198 countries.
Sri Lanka has averaged higher in every one of the 20 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Barbados | Sri Lanka | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1830s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1840s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1850s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1860s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1870s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1880s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1890s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1900s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1910s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1920s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1930s | 0 | 0.8 | 0.8 | Sri Lanka |
| 1940s | 0 | 1 | 1 | Sri Lanka |
| 1950s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1960s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1970s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1980s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1990s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2000s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2020s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher men's universal right to vote, Barbados or Sri Lanka?
- Barbados, at 1 against 1 in Sri Lanka as of 2025.
- What is the difference in men's universal right to vote between Barbados and Sri Lanka?
- 0, with Barbados ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Barbados and Sri Lanka?
- 187 years are reported by both, from 1839 to 2025.
- How do Barbados and Sri Lanka rank globally for men's universal right to vote?
- Barbados ranks 1st and Sri Lanka ranks 1st of 198 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Men's universal right to vote. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Indicates whether all men are allowed to vote in national elections. It neither considers informal restrictions nor legal restrictions based on age, criminal conviction, disability, and local residency.