Barbados vs Uruguay: Men's universal right to vote
Barbados
1
in 2025
Uruguay
1
in 2025
Barbados rank
1st
Uruguay rank
1st
Men's universal right to vote over time
- Barbados
- Uruguay
How they compare
Barbados currently reports 1 against 1 in Uruguay, a difference of 0.
Across all 187 years both countries report, Uruguay has been ahead every year.
Barbados ranks 1st and Uruguay ranks 1st of 198 countries.
Uruguay has averaged higher in every one of the 20 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Barbados | Uruguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1830s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1840s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1850s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1860s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1870s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1880s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1890s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1900s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1910s | 0 | 0.2 | 0.2 | Uruguay |
| 1920s | 0 | 1 | 1 | Uruguay |
| 1930s | 0 | 1 | 1 | Uruguay |
| 1940s | 0 | 1 | 1 | Uruguay |
| 1950s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1960s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1970s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1980s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1990s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2000s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2020s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher men's universal right to vote, Barbados or Uruguay?
- Barbados, at 1 against 1 in Uruguay as of 2025.
- What is the difference in men's universal right to vote between Barbados and Uruguay?
- 0, with Barbados ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Barbados and Uruguay?
- 187 years are reported by both, from 1839 to 2025.
- How do Barbados and Uruguay rank globally for men's universal right to vote?
- Barbados ranks 1st and Uruguay ranks 1st of 198 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Men's universal right to vote. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Indicates whether all men are allowed to vote in national elections. It neither considers informal restrictions nor legal restrictions based on age, criminal conviction, disability, and local residency.