Belgium vs Georgia: Men's universal right to vote
Belgium
1
in 2025
Georgia
1
in 2025
Belgium rank
1st
Georgia rank
1st
Men's universal right to vote over time
- Belgium
- Georgia
How they compare
Belgium currently reports 1 against 1 in Georgia, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 196 shared years of data; in 1830 it was Georgia ahead.
Belgium ranks 1st and Georgia ranks 1st of 198 countries.
Belgium has averaged higher in every one of the 20 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belgium | Georgia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1830s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1840s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1850s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1860s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1870s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1880s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1890s | 0.6 | 0 | 0.6 | Belgium |
| 1900s | 1 | 0.5 | 0.5 | Belgium |
| 1910s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1920s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1930s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1940s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1950s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1960s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1970s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1980s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1990s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2000s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2020s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher men's universal right to vote, Belgium or Georgia?
- Belgium, at 1 against 1 in Georgia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in men's universal right to vote between Belgium and Georgia?
- 0, with Belgium ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and Georgia?
- 196 years are reported by both, from 1830 to 2025.
- How do Belgium and Georgia rank globally for men's universal right to vote?
- Belgium ranks 1st and Georgia ranks 1st of 198 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Men's universal right to vote. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Indicates whether all men are allowed to vote in national elections. It neither considers informal restrictions nor legal restrictions based on age, criminal conviction, disability, and local residency.