Belize vs Liechtenstein: Men's universal right to vote
Belize
1
in 2025
Liechtenstein
1
in 2025
Belize rank
1st
Liechtenstein rank
1st
Men's universal right to vote over time
- Belize
- Liechtenstein
How they compare
Belize currently reports 1 against 1 in Liechtenstein, a difference of 0.
Across all 164 years both countries report, Liechtenstein has been ahead every year.
Belize ranks 1st and Liechtenstein ranks 1st of 198 countries.
Liechtenstein has averaged higher in every one of the 17 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belize | Liechtenstein | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1860s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1870s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1880s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1890s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1900s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1910s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1920s | 0 | 0.9 | 0.9 | Liechtenstein |
| 1930s | 0 | 1 | 1 | Liechtenstein |
| 1940s | 0 | 1 | 1 | Liechtenstein |
| 1950s | 0.6 | 1 | 0.4 | Liechtenstein |
| 1960s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1970s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1980s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1990s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2000s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2020s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher men's universal right to vote, Belize or Liechtenstein?
- Belize, at 1 against 1 in Liechtenstein as of 2025.
- What is the difference in men's universal right to vote between Belize and Liechtenstein?
- 0, with Belize ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belize and Liechtenstein?
- 164 years are reported by both, from 1862 to 2025.
- How do Belize and Liechtenstein rank globally for men's universal right to vote?
- Belize ranks 1st and Liechtenstein ranks 1st of 198 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Men's universal right to vote. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Indicates whether all men are allowed to vote in national elections. It neither considers informal restrictions nor legal restrictions based on age, criminal conviction, disability, and local residency.