Bolivia vs Myanmar: Men's universal right to vote
Bolivia
1
in 2025
Myanmar
1
in 2025
Bolivia rank
1st
Myanmar rank
1st
Men's universal right to vote over time
- Bolivia
- Myanmar
How they compare
Bolivia currently reports 1 against 1 in Myanmar, a difference of 0.
Across all 201 years both countries report, Myanmar has been ahead every year.
Bolivia ranks 1st and Myanmar ranks 1st of 198 countries.
Myanmar has averaged higher in every one of the 21 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bolivia | Myanmar | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1820s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1830s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1840s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1850s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1860s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1870s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1880s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1890s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1900s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1910s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1920s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1930s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1940s | 0 | 0.2 | 0.2 | Myanmar |
| 1950s | 0.8 | 1 | 0.2 | Myanmar |
| 1960s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1970s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1980s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1990s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2000s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2020s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher men's universal right to vote, Bolivia or Myanmar?
- Bolivia, at 1 against 1 in Myanmar as of 2025.
- What is the difference in men's universal right to vote between Bolivia and Myanmar?
- 0, with Bolivia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bolivia and Myanmar?
- 201 years are reported by both, from 1825 to 2025.
- How do Bolivia and Myanmar rank globally for men's universal right to vote?
- Bolivia ranks 1st and Myanmar ranks 1st of 198 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Men's universal right to vote. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Indicates whether all men are allowed to vote in national elections. It neither considers informal restrictions nor legal restrictions based on age, criminal conviction, disability, and local residency.