Botswana vs Philippines: Men's universal right to vote
Botswana
1
in 2025
Philippines
1
in 2025
Botswana rank
1st
Philippines rank
1st
Men's universal right to vote over time
- Botswana
- Philippines
How they compare
Botswana currently reports 1 against 1 in Philippines, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 141 shared years of data; in 1885 it was Philippines ahead.
Botswana ranks 1st and Philippines ranks 1st of 198 countries.
Botswana has averaged higher in every one of the 15 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Botswana | Philippines | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1880s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1890s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1900s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1910s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1920s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1930s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1940s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1950s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1960s | 0.9 | 0 | 0.9 | Botswana |
| 1970s | 1 | 0.7 | 0.3 | Botswana |
| 1980s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1990s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2000s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2020s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher men's universal right to vote, Botswana or Philippines?
- Botswana, at 1 against 1 in Philippines as of 2025.
- What is the difference in men's universal right to vote between Botswana and Philippines?
- 0, with Botswana ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Philippines?
- 141 years are reported by both, from 1885 to 2025.
- How do Botswana and Philippines rank globally for men's universal right to vote?
- Botswana ranks 1st and Philippines ranks 1st of 198 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Men's universal right to vote. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Indicates whether all men are allowed to vote in national elections. It neither considers informal restrictions nor legal restrictions based on age, criminal conviction, disability, and local residency.