Bulgaria vs Equatorial Guinea: Men's universal right to vote
Bulgaria
1
in 2025
Equatorial Guinea
1
in 2025
Bulgaria rank
1st
Equatorial Guinea rank
1st
Men's universal right to vote over time
- Bulgaria
- Equatorial Guinea
How they compare
Bulgaria currently reports 1 against 1 in Equatorial Guinea, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 126 shared years of data; in 1900 it was Bulgaria ahead.
Bulgaria ranks 1st and Equatorial Guinea ranks 1st of 198 countries.
Bulgaria has averaged higher in every one of the 13 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bulgaria | Equatorial Guinea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1900s | 1 | 0 | 1 | Bulgaria |
| 1910s | 1 | 0 | 1 | Bulgaria |
| 1920s | 1 | 0 | 1 | Bulgaria |
| 1930s | 1 | 0 | 1 | Bulgaria |
| 1940s | 1 | 0 | 1 | Bulgaria |
| 1950s | 1 | 0 | 1 | Bulgaria |
| 1960s | 1 | 0.2 | 0.8 | Bulgaria |
| 1970s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1980s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1990s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2000s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2020s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher men's universal right to vote, Bulgaria or Equatorial Guinea?
- Bulgaria, at 1 against 1 in Equatorial Guinea as of 2025.
- What is the difference in men's universal right to vote between Bulgaria and Equatorial Guinea?
- 0, with Bulgaria ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bulgaria and Equatorial Guinea?
- 126 years are reported by both, from 1900 to 2025.
- How do Bulgaria and Equatorial Guinea rank globally for men's universal right to vote?
- Bulgaria ranks 1st and Equatorial Guinea ranks 1st of 198 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Men's universal right to vote. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Indicates whether all men are allowed to vote in national elections. It neither considers informal restrictions nor legal restrictions based on age, criminal conviction, disability, and local residency.