Cape Verde vs Equatorial Guinea: Men's universal right to vote
Cape Verde
1
in 2025
Equatorial Guinea
1
in 2025
Cape Verde rank
1st
Equatorial Guinea rank
1st
Men's universal right to vote over time
- Cape Verde
- Equatorial Guinea
How they compare
Cape Verde currently reports 1 against 1 in Equatorial Guinea, a difference of 0.
Across all 126 years both countries report, Equatorial Guinea has been ahead every year.
Cape Verde ranks 1st and Equatorial Guinea ranks 1st of 198 countries.
Equatorial Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 13 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cape Verde | Equatorial Guinea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1900s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1910s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1920s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1930s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1940s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1950s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1960s | 0 | 0.2 | 0.2 | Equatorial Guinea |
| 1970s | 0.5 | 1 | 0.5 | Equatorial Guinea |
| 1980s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1990s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2000s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2020s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher men's universal right to vote, Cape Verde or Equatorial Guinea?
- Cape Verde, at 1 against 1 in Equatorial Guinea as of 2025.
- What is the difference in men's universal right to vote between Cape Verde and Equatorial Guinea?
- 0, with Cape Verde ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cape Verde and Equatorial Guinea?
- 126 years are reported by both, from 1900 to 2025.
- How do Cape Verde and Equatorial Guinea rank globally for men's universal right to vote?
- Cape Verde ranks 1st and Equatorial Guinea ranks 1st of 198 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Men's universal right to vote. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Indicates whether all men are allowed to vote in national elections. It neither considers informal restrictions nor legal restrictions based on age, criminal conviction, disability, and local residency.