Cambodia vs Marshall Islands: Men's universal right to vote
Cambodia
1
in 2025
Marshall Islands
1
in 2025
Cambodia rank
1st
Marshall Islands rank
1st
Men's universal right to vote over time
- Cambodia
- Marshall Islands
How they compare
Cambodia currently reports 1 against 1 in Marshall Islands, a difference of 0.
Across all 151 years both countries report, Marshall Islands has been ahead every year.
Cambodia ranks 1st and Marshall Islands ranks 1st of 198 countries.
Marshall Islands has averaged higher in every one of the 16 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cambodia | Marshall Islands | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1870s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1880s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1890s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1900s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1910s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1920s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1930s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1940s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1950s | 0.4 | 1 | 0.6 | Marshall Islands |
| 1960s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1970s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1980s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1990s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2000s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2020s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher men's universal right to vote, Cambodia or Marshall Islands?
- Cambodia, at 1 against 1 in Marshall Islands as of 2025.
- What is the difference in men's universal right to vote between Cambodia and Marshall Islands?
- 0, with Cambodia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cambodia and Marshall Islands?
- 151 years are reported by both, from 1875 to 2025.
- How do Cambodia and Marshall Islands rank globally for men's universal right to vote?
- Cambodia ranks 1st and Marshall Islands ranks 1st of 198 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Men's universal right to vote. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Indicates whether all men are allowed to vote in national elections. It neither considers informal restrictions nor legal restrictions based on age, criminal conviction, disability, and local residency.