Central African Republic vs North Korea: Men's universal right to vote
Central African Republic
1
in 2025
North Korea
1
in 2025
Central African Republic rank
1st
North Korea rank
1st
Men's universal right to vote over time
- Central African Republic
- North Korea
How they compare
Central African Republic currently reports 1 against 1 in North Korea, a difference of 0.
Across all 78 years both countries report, North Korea has been ahead every year.
Central African Republic ranks 1st and North Korea ranks 1st of 198 countries.
North Korea has averaged higher in every one of the 9 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Central African Republic | North Korea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1940s | 0 | 1 | 1 | North Korea |
| 1950s | 0.3 | 1 | 0.7 | North Korea |
| 1960s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1970s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1980s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1990s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2000s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2020s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher men's universal right to vote, Central African Republic or North Korea?
- Central African Republic, at 1 against 1 in North Korea as of 2025.
- What is the difference in men's universal right to vote between Central African Republic and North Korea?
- 0, with Central African Republic ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Central African Republic and North Korea?
- 78 years are reported by both, from 1948 to 2025.
- How do Central African Republic and North Korea rank globally for men's universal right to vote?
- Central African Republic ranks 1st and North Korea ranks 1st of 198 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Men's universal right to vote. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Indicates whether all men are allowed to vote in national elections. It neither considers informal restrictions nor legal restrictions based on age, criminal conviction, disability, and local residency.