Central African Republic vs Moldova: Men's universal right to vote
Central African Republic
1
in 2025
Moldova
1
in 2025
Central African Republic rank
1st
Moldova rank
1st
Men's universal right to vote over time
- Central African Republic
- Moldova
How they compare
Central African Republic currently reports 1 against 1 in Moldova, a difference of 0.
Across all 112 years both countries report, Moldova has been ahead every year.
Central African Republic ranks 1st and Moldova ranks 1st of 198 countries.
Moldova has averaged higher in every one of the 12 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Central African Republic | Moldova | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1890s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1900s | 0 | 0.5 | 0.5 | Moldova |
| 1910s | 0 | 1 | 1 | Moldova |
| 1940s | 0 | 1 | 1 | Moldova |
| 1950s | 0.3 | 1 | 0.7 | Moldova |
| 1960s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1970s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1980s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1990s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2000s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2020s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher men's universal right to vote, Central African Republic or Moldova?
- Central African Republic, at 1 against 1 in Moldova as of 2025.
- What is the difference in men's universal right to vote between Central African Republic and Moldova?
- 0, with Central African Republic ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Central African Republic and Moldova?
- 112 years are reported by both, from 1894 to 2025.
- How do Central African Republic and Moldova rank globally for men's universal right to vote?
- Central African Republic ranks 1st and Moldova ranks 1st of 198 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Men's universal right to vote. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Indicates whether all men are allowed to vote in national elections. It neither considers informal restrictions nor legal restrictions based on age, criminal conviction, disability, and local residency.