Chile vs Moldova: Men's universal right to vote
Chile
1
in 2025
Moldova
1
in 2025
Chile rank
1st
Moldova rank
1st
Men's universal right to vote over time
- Chile
- Moldova
How they compare
Chile currently reports 1 against 1 in Moldova, a difference of 0.
Across all 206 years both countries report, Moldova has been ahead every year.
Chile ranks 1st and Moldova ranks 1st of 198 countries.
Moldova has averaged higher in every one of the 21 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Moldova | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1800s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1810s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1820s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1830s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1840s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1850s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1860s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1870s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1880s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1890s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1900s | 0 | 0.5 | 0.5 | Moldova |
| 1910s | 0 | 1 | 1 | Moldova |
| 1940s | 0 | 1 | 1 | Moldova |
| 1950s | 0 | 1 | 1 | Moldova |
| 1960s | 0 | 1 | 1 | Moldova |
| 1970s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1980s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1990s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2000s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2020s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher men's universal right to vote, Chile or Moldova?
- Chile, at 1 against 1 in Moldova as of 2025.
- What is the difference in men's universal right to vote between Chile and Moldova?
- 0, with Chile ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Moldova?
- 206 years are reported by both, from 1800 to 2025.
- How do Chile and Moldova rank globally for men's universal right to vote?
- Chile ranks 1st and Moldova ranks 1st of 198 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Men's universal right to vote. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Indicates whether all men are allowed to vote in national elections. It neither considers informal restrictions nor legal restrictions based on age, criminal conviction, disability, and local residency.