Democratic Republic of Congo vs Jordan: Men's universal right to vote
Democratic Republic of Congo
1
in 2025
Jordan
1
in 2025
Democratic Republic of Congo rank
1st
Jordan rank
1st
Men's universal right to vote over time
- Democratic Republic of Congo
- Jordan
How they compare
Democratic Republic of Congo currently reports 1 against 1 in Jordan, a difference of 0.
Across all 104 years both countries report, Jordan has been ahead every year.
Democratic Republic of Congo ranks 1st and Jordan ranks 1st of 198 countries.
Jordan has averaged higher in every one of the 11 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Democratic Republic of Congo | Jordan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1920s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1930s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1940s | 0 | 0.3 | 0.3 | Jordan |
| 1950s | 0 | 1 | 1 | Jordan |
| 1960s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1970s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1980s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1990s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2000s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2020s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher men's universal right to vote, Democratic Republic of Congo or Jordan?
- Democratic Republic of Congo, at 1 against 1 in Jordan as of 2025.
- What is the difference in men's universal right to vote between Democratic Republic of Congo and Jordan?
- 0, with Democratic Republic of Congo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Democratic Republic of Congo and Jordan?
- 104 years are reported by both, from 1922 to 2025.
- How do Democratic Republic of Congo and Jordan rank globally for men's universal right to vote?
- Democratic Republic of Congo ranks 1st and Jordan ranks 1st of 198 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Men's universal right to vote. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Indicates whether all men are allowed to vote in national elections. It neither considers informal restrictions nor legal restrictions based on age, criminal conviction, disability, and local residency.