Costa Rica vs Seychelles: Men's universal right to vote
Costa Rica
1
in 2025
Seychelles
1
in 2025
Costa Rica rank
1st
Seychelles rank
1st
Men's universal right to vote over time
- Costa Rica
- Seychelles
How they compare
Costa Rica currently reports 1 against 1 in Seychelles, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 123 shared years of data; in 1903 it was Seychelles ahead.
Costa Rica ranks 1st and Seychelles ranks 1st of 198 countries.
Costa Rica has averaged higher in every one of the 13 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Costa Rica | Seychelles | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1900s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1910s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1920s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1930s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1940s | 0.1 | 0 | 0.1 | Costa Rica |
| 1950s | 1 | 0 | 1 | Costa Rica |
| 1960s | 1 | 0.3 | 0.7 | Costa Rica |
| 1970s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1980s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1990s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2000s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2020s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher men's universal right to vote, Costa Rica or Seychelles?
- Costa Rica, at 1 against 1 in Seychelles as of 2025.
- What is the difference in men's universal right to vote between Costa Rica and Seychelles?
- 0, with Costa Rica ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Seychelles?
- 123 years are reported by both, from 1903 to 2025.
- How do Costa Rica and Seychelles rank globally for men's universal right to vote?
- Costa Rica ranks 1st and Seychelles ranks 1st of 198 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Men's universal right to vote. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Indicates whether all men are allowed to vote in national elections. It neither considers informal restrictions nor legal restrictions based on age, criminal conviction, disability, and local residency.