Cuba vs Luxembourg: Men's universal right to vote
Cuba
1
in 2025
Luxembourg
1
in 2025
Cuba rank
1st
Luxembourg rank
1st
Men's universal right to vote over time
- Cuba
- Luxembourg
How they compare
Cuba currently reports 1 against 1 in Luxembourg, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 211 shared years of data; in 1815 it was Luxembourg ahead.
Cuba ranks 1st and Luxembourg ranks 1st of 198 countries.
Cuba has averaged higher in every one of the 22 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cuba | Luxembourg | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1810s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1820s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1830s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1840s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1850s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1860s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1870s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1880s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1890s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1900s | 0.9 | 0 | 0.9 | Cuba |
| 1910s | 1 | 0.1 | 0.9 | Cuba |
| 1920s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1930s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1940s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1950s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1960s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1970s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1980s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1990s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2000s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2020s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher men's universal right to vote, Cuba or Luxembourg?
- Cuba, at 1 against 1 in Luxembourg as of 2025.
- What is the difference in men's universal right to vote between Cuba and Luxembourg?
- 0, with Cuba ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Luxembourg?
- 211 years are reported by both, from 1815 to 2025.
- How do Cuba and Luxembourg rank globally for men's universal right to vote?
- Cuba ranks 1st and Luxembourg ranks 1st of 198 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Men's universal right to vote. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Indicates whether all men are allowed to vote in national elections. It neither considers informal restrictions nor legal restrictions based on age, criminal conviction, disability, and local residency.