Cyprus vs San Marino: Men's universal right to vote
Cyprus
1
in 2025
San Marino
1
in 2025
Cyprus rank
1st
San Marino rank
1st
Men's universal right to vote over time
- Cyprus
- San Marino
How they compare
Cyprus currently reports 1 against 1 in San Marino, a difference of 0.
Across all 148 years both countries report, San Marino has been ahead every year.
Cyprus ranks 1st and San Marino ranks 1st of 198 countries.
San Marino has averaged higher in every one of the 16 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cyprus | San Marino | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1870s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1880s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1890s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1900s | 0 | 0.1 | 0.1 | San Marino |
| 1910s | 0 | 1 | 1 | San Marino |
| 1920s | 0 | 1 | 1 | San Marino |
| 1930s | 0 | 1 | 1 | San Marino |
| 1940s | 0 | 1 | 1 | San Marino |
| 1950s | 0.1 | 1 | 0.9 | San Marino |
| 1960s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1970s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1980s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1990s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2000s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2020s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher men's universal right to vote, Cyprus or San Marino?
- Cyprus, at 1 against 1 in San Marino as of 2025.
- What is the difference in men's universal right to vote between Cyprus and San Marino?
- 0, with Cyprus ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cyprus and San Marino?
- 148 years are reported by both, from 1878 to 2025.
- How do Cyprus and San Marino rank globally for men's universal right to vote?
- Cyprus ranks 1st and San Marino ranks 1st of 198 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Men's universal right to vote. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Indicates whether all men are allowed to vote in national elections. It neither considers informal restrictions nor legal restrictions based on age, criminal conviction, disability, and local residency.