Denmark vs Honduras: Men's universal right to vote
Denmark
1
in 2025
Honduras
1
in 2025
Denmark rank
1st
Honduras rank
1st
Men's universal right to vote over time
- Denmark
- Honduras
How they compare
Denmark currently reports 1 against 1 in Honduras, a difference of 0.
Across all 188 years both countries report, Honduras has been ahead every year.
Denmark ranks 1st and Honduras ranks 1st of 198 countries.
Honduras has averaged higher in every one of the 20 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Denmark | Honduras | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1830s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1840s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1850s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1860s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1870s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1880s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1890s | 0 | 0.6 | 0.6 | Honduras |
| 1900s | 0 | 1 | 1 | Honduras |
| 1910s | 0.5 | 1 | 0.5 | Honduras |
| 1920s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1930s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1940s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1950s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1960s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1970s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1980s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1990s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2000s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2020s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher men's universal right to vote, Denmark or Honduras?
- Denmark, at 1 against 1 in Honduras as of 2025.
- What is the difference in men's universal right to vote between Denmark and Honduras?
- 0, with Denmark ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Denmark and Honduras?
- 188 years are reported by both, from 1838 to 2025.
- How do Denmark and Honduras rank globally for men's universal right to vote?
- Denmark ranks 1st and Honduras ranks 1st of 198 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Men's universal right to vote. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Indicates whether all men are allowed to vote in national elections. It neither considers informal restrictions nor legal restrictions based on age, criminal conviction, disability, and local residency.