Dominican Republic vs Germany: Men's universal right to vote
Dominican Republic
1
in 2025
Germany
1
in 2025
Dominican Republic rank
1st
Germany rank
1st
Men's universal right to vote over time
- Dominican Republic
- Germany
How they compare
Dominican Republic currently reports 1 against 1 in Germany, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 114 shared years of data; in 1867 it was Dominican Republic ahead.
Dominican Republic ranks 1st and Germany ranks 1st of 198 countries.
Across the 13 decades both report, Dominican Republic averaged higher in 1 and Germany in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Dominican Republic | Germany | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1860s | 0.3333 | 0 | 0.3333 | Dominican Republic |
| 1870s | 0.5 | 0.9 | 0.4 | Germany |
| 1880s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1890s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1900s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1910s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1920s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1930s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1940s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1990s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2000s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2020s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher men's universal right to vote, Dominican Republic or Germany?
- Dominican Republic, at 1 against 1 in Germany as of 2025.
- What is the difference in men's universal right to vote between Dominican Republic and Germany?
- 0, with Dominican Republic ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Dominican Republic and Germany?
- 114 years are reported by both, from 1867 to 2025.
- How do Dominican Republic and Germany rank globally for men's universal right to vote?
- Dominican Republic ranks 1st and Germany ranks 1st of 198 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Men's universal right to vote. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Indicates whether all men are allowed to vote in national elections. It neither considers informal restrictions nor legal restrictions based on age, criminal conviction, disability, and local residency.