Ecuador vs Sweden: Men's universal right to vote
Ecuador
1
in 2025
Sweden
1
in 2025
Ecuador rank
1st
Sweden rank
1st
Men's universal right to vote over time
- Ecuador
- Sweden
How they compare
Ecuador currently reports 1 against 1 in Sweden, a difference of 0.
Across all 196 years both countries report, Sweden has been ahead every year.
Ecuador ranks 1st and Sweden ranks 1st of 198 countries.
Sweden has averaged higher in every one of the 20 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | Sweden | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1830s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1840s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1850s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1860s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1870s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1880s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1890s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1900s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1910s | 0 | 0.1 | 0.1 | Sweden |
| 1920s | 0 | 1 | 1 | Sweden |
| 1930s | 0 | 1 | 1 | Sweden |
| 1940s | 0 | 1 | 1 | Sweden |
| 1950s | 0 | 1 | 1 | Sweden |
| 1960s | 0 | 1 | 1 | Sweden |
| 1970s | 0.2 | 1 | 0.8 | Sweden |
| 1980s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1990s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2000s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2020s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher men's universal right to vote, Ecuador or Sweden?
- Ecuador, at 1 against 1 in Sweden as of 2025.
- What is the difference in men's universal right to vote between Ecuador and Sweden?
- 0, with Ecuador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Sweden?
- 196 years are reported by both, from 1830 to 2025.
- How do Ecuador and Sweden rank globally for men's universal right to vote?
- Ecuador ranks 1st and Sweden ranks 1st of 198 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Men's universal right to vote. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Indicates whether all men are allowed to vote in national elections. It neither considers informal restrictions nor legal restrictions based on age, criminal conviction, disability, and local residency.