Equatorial Guinea vs Ireland: Men's universal right to vote
Equatorial Guinea
1
in 2025
Ireland
1
in 2025
Equatorial Guinea rank
1st
Ireland rank
1st
Men's universal right to vote over time
- Equatorial Guinea
- Ireland
How they compare
Equatorial Guinea currently reports 1 against 1 in Ireland, a difference of 0.
Across all 108 years both countries report, Ireland has been ahead every year.
Equatorial Guinea ranks 1st and Ireland ranks 1st of 198 countries.
Ireland has averaged higher in every one of the 12 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Equatorial Guinea | Ireland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1910s | 0 | 1 | 1 | Ireland |
| 1920s | 0 | 1 | 1 | Ireland |
| 1930s | 0 | 1 | 1 | Ireland |
| 1940s | 0 | 1 | 1 | Ireland |
| 1950s | 0 | 1 | 1 | Ireland |
| 1960s | 0.2 | 1 | 0.8 | Ireland |
| 1970s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1980s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1990s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2000s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2020s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher men's universal right to vote, Equatorial Guinea or Ireland?
- Equatorial Guinea, at 1 against 1 in Ireland as of 2025.
- What is the difference in men's universal right to vote between Equatorial Guinea and Ireland?
- 0, with Equatorial Guinea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Ireland?
- 108 years are reported by both, from 1918 to 2025.
- How do Equatorial Guinea and Ireland rank globally for men's universal right to vote?
- Equatorial Guinea ranks 1st and Ireland ranks 1st of 198 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Men's universal right to vote. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Indicates whether all men are allowed to vote in national elections. It neither considers informal restrictions nor legal restrictions based on age, criminal conviction, disability, and local residency.