Equatorial Guinea vs South Korea: Men's universal right to vote
Equatorial Guinea
1
in 2025
South Korea
1
in 2025
Equatorial Guinea rank
1st
South Korea rank
1st
Men's universal right to vote over time
- Equatorial Guinea
- South Korea
How they compare
Equatorial Guinea currently reports 1 against 1 in South Korea, a difference of 0.
Across all 78 years both countries report, South Korea has been ahead every year.
Equatorial Guinea ranks 1st and South Korea ranks 1st of 198 countries.
South Korea has averaged higher in every one of the 9 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Equatorial Guinea | South Korea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1940s | 0 | 1 | 1 | South Korea |
| 1950s | 0 | 1 | 1 | South Korea |
| 1960s | 0.2 | 1 | 0.8 | South Korea |
| 1970s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1980s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1990s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2000s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2020s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher men's universal right to vote, Equatorial Guinea or South Korea?
- Equatorial Guinea, at 1 against 1 in South Korea as of 2025.
- What is the difference in men's universal right to vote between Equatorial Guinea and South Korea?
- 0, with Equatorial Guinea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and South Korea?
- 78 years are reported by both, from 1948 to 2025.
- How do Equatorial Guinea and South Korea rank globally for men's universal right to vote?
- Equatorial Guinea ranks 1st and South Korea ranks 1st of 198 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Men's universal right to vote. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Indicates whether all men are allowed to vote in national elections. It neither considers informal restrictions nor legal restrictions based on age, criminal conviction, disability, and local residency.