Equatorial Guinea vs Poland: Men's universal right to vote
Equatorial Guinea
1
in 2025
Poland
1
in 2025
Equatorial Guinea rank
1st
Poland rank
1st
Men's universal right to vote over time
- Equatorial Guinea
- Poland
How they compare
Equatorial Guinea currently reports 1 against 1 in Poland, a difference of 0.
Across all 126 years both countries report, Poland has been ahead every year.
Equatorial Guinea ranks 1st and Poland ranks 1st of 198 countries.
Poland has averaged higher in every one of the 13 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Equatorial Guinea | Poland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1900s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1910s | 0 | 0.1 | 0.1 | Poland |
| 1920s | 0 | 1 | 1 | Poland |
| 1930s | 0 | 1 | 1 | Poland |
| 1940s | 0 | 1 | 1 | Poland |
| 1950s | 0 | 1 | 1 | Poland |
| 1960s | 0.2 | 1 | 0.8 | Poland |
| 1970s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1980s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1990s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2000s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2020s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher men's universal right to vote, Equatorial Guinea or Poland?
- Equatorial Guinea, at 1 against 1 in Poland as of 2025.
- What is the difference in men's universal right to vote between Equatorial Guinea and Poland?
- 0, with Equatorial Guinea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Poland?
- 126 years are reported by both, from 1900 to 2025.
- How do Equatorial Guinea and Poland rank globally for men's universal right to vote?
- Equatorial Guinea ranks 1st and Poland ranks 1st of 198 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Men's universal right to vote. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Indicates whether all men are allowed to vote in national elections. It neither considers informal restrictions nor legal restrictions based on age, criminal conviction, disability, and local residency.