Equatorial Guinea vs Solomon Islands: Men's universal right to vote
Equatorial Guinea
1
in 2025
Solomon Islands
1
in 2025
Equatorial Guinea rank
1st
Solomon Islands rank
1st
Men's universal right to vote over time
- Equatorial Guinea
- Solomon Islands
How they compare
Equatorial Guinea currently reports 1 against 1 in Solomon Islands, a difference of 0.
Across all 126 years both countries report, Solomon Islands has been ahead every year.
Equatorial Guinea ranks 1st and Solomon Islands ranks 1st of 198 countries.
Solomon Islands has averaged higher in every one of the 13 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Equatorial Guinea | Solomon Islands | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1900s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1910s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1920s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1930s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1940s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1950s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1960s | 0.2 | 0.6 | 0.4 | Solomon Islands |
| 1970s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1980s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1990s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2000s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2020s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher men's universal right to vote, Equatorial Guinea or Solomon Islands?
- Equatorial Guinea, at 1 against 1 in Solomon Islands as of 2025.
- What is the difference in men's universal right to vote between Equatorial Guinea and Solomon Islands?
- 0, with Equatorial Guinea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Solomon Islands?
- 126 years are reported by both, from 1900 to 2025.
- How do Equatorial Guinea and Solomon Islands rank globally for men's universal right to vote?
- Equatorial Guinea ranks 1st and Solomon Islands ranks 1st of 198 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Men's universal right to vote. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Indicates whether all men are allowed to vote in national elections. It neither considers informal restrictions nor legal restrictions based on age, criminal conviction, disability, and local residency.