Eswatini vs Netherlands: Men's universal right to vote
Eswatini
1
in 2025
Netherlands
1
in 2025
Eswatini rank
1st
Netherlands rank
1st
Men's universal right to vote over time
- Eswatini
- Netherlands
How they compare
Eswatini currently reports 1 against 1 in Netherlands, a difference of 0.
Across all 127 years both countries report, Netherlands has been ahead every year.
Eswatini ranks 1st and Netherlands ranks 1st of 198 countries.
Netherlands has averaged higher in every one of the 14 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eswatini | Netherlands | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1890s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1900s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1910s | 0 | 0.3 | 0.3 | Netherlands |
| 1920s | 0 | 1 | 1 | Netherlands |
| 1930s | 0 | 1 | 1 | Netherlands |
| 1940s | 0 | 1 | 1 | Netherlands |
| 1950s | 0 | 1 | 1 | Netherlands |
| 1960s | 0.6 | 1 | 0.4 | Netherlands |
| 1970s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1980s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1990s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2000s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2020s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher men's universal right to vote, Eswatini or Netherlands?
- Eswatini, at 1 against 1 in Netherlands as of 2025.
- What is the difference in men's universal right to vote between Eswatini and Netherlands?
- 0, with Eswatini ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Netherlands?
- 127 years are reported by both, from 1899 to 2025.
- How do Eswatini and Netherlands rank globally for men's universal right to vote?
- Eswatini ranks 1st and Netherlands ranks 1st of 198 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Men's universal right to vote. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Indicates whether all men are allowed to vote in national elections. It neither considers informal restrictions nor legal restrictions based on age, criminal conviction, disability, and local residency.