Finland vs Tonga: Men's universal right to vote
Finland
1
in 2025
Tonga
1
in 2025
Finland rank
1st
Tonga rank
1st
Men's universal right to vote over time
- Finland
- Tonga
How they compare
Finland currently reports 1 against 1 in Tonga, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 181 shared years of data; in 1845 it was Tonga ahead.
Finland ranks 1st and Tonga ranks 1st of 198 countries.
Finland has averaged higher in every one of the 19 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Finland | Tonga | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1840s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1850s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1860s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1870s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1880s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1890s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1900s | 0.4 | 0 | 0.4 | Finland |
| 1910s | 1 | 0 | 1 | Finland |
| 1920s | 1 | 0 | 1 | Finland |
| 1930s | 1 | 0 | 1 | Finland |
| 1940s | 1 | 0 | 1 | Finland |
| 1950s | 1 | 0 | 1 | Finland |
| 1960s | 1 | 0 | 1 | Finland |
| 1970s | 1 | 0 | 1 | Finland |
| 1980s | 1 | 0 | 1 | Finland |
| 1990s | 1 | 0 | 1 | Finland |
| 2000s | 1 | 0 | 1 | Finland |
| 2010s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2020s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher men's universal right to vote, Finland or Tonga?
- Finland, at 1 against 1 in Tonga as of 2025.
- What is the difference in men's universal right to vote between Finland and Tonga?
- 0, with Finland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Finland and Tonga?
- 181 years are reported by both, from 1845 to 2025.
- How do Finland and Tonga rank globally for men's universal right to vote?
- Finland ranks 1st and Tonga ranks 1st of 198 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Men's universal right to vote. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Indicates whether all men are allowed to vote in national elections. It neither considers informal restrictions nor legal restrictions based on age, criminal conviction, disability, and local residency.