Guatemala vs Poland: Men's universal right to vote
Guatemala
1
in 2025
Poland
1
in 2025
Guatemala rank
1st
Poland rank
1st
Men's universal right to vote over time
- Guatemala
- Poland
How they compare
Guatemala currently reports 1 against 1 in Poland, a difference of 0.
Across all 176 years both countries report, Poland has been ahead every year.
Guatemala ranks 1st and Poland ranks 1st of 198 countries.
Poland has averaged higher in every one of the 20 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guatemala | Poland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1780s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1790s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1800s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1860s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1870s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1880s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1890s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1900s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1910s | 0 | 0.1 | 0.1 | Poland |
| 1920s | 0 | 1 | 1 | Poland |
| 1930s | 0 | 1 | 1 | Poland |
| 1940s | 0 | 1 | 1 | Poland |
| 1950s | 0.4 | 1 | 0.6 | Poland |
| 1960s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1970s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1980s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1990s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2000s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2020s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher men's universal right to vote, Guatemala or Poland?
- Guatemala, at 1 against 1 in Poland as of 2025.
- What is the difference in men's universal right to vote between Guatemala and Poland?
- 0, with Guatemala ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guatemala and Poland?
- 176 years are reported by both, from 1789 to 2025.
- How do Guatemala and Poland rank globally for men's universal right to vote?
- Guatemala ranks 1st and Poland ranks 1st of 198 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Men's universal right to vote. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Indicates whether all men are allowed to vote in national elections. It neither considers informal restrictions nor legal restrictions based on age, criminal conviction, disability, and local residency.