Honduras vs Japan: Men's universal right to vote
Honduras
1
in 2025
Japan
1
in 2025
Honduras rank
1st
Japan rank
1st
Men's universal right to vote over time
- Honduras
- Japan
How they compare
Honduras currently reports 1 against 1 in Japan, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 188 shared years of data; in 1838 it was Japan ahead.
Honduras ranks 1st and Japan ranks 1st of 198 countries.
Honduras has averaged higher in every one of the 20 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Honduras | Japan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1830s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1840s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1850s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1860s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1870s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1880s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1890s | 0.6 | 0 | 0.6 | Honduras |
| 1900s | 1 | 0 | 1 | Honduras |
| 1910s | 1 | 0 | 1 | Honduras |
| 1920s | 1 | 0.5 | 0.5 | Honduras |
| 1930s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1940s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1950s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1960s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1970s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1980s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1990s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2000s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2020s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher men's universal right to vote, Honduras or Japan?
- Honduras, at 1 against 1 in Japan as of 2025.
- What is the difference in men's universal right to vote between Honduras and Japan?
- 0, with Honduras ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Honduras and Japan?
- 188 years are reported by both, from 1838 to 2025.
- How do Honduras and Japan rank globally for men's universal right to vote?
- Honduras ranks 1st and Japan ranks 1st of 198 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Men's universal right to vote. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Indicates whether all men are allowed to vote in national elections. It neither considers informal restrictions nor legal restrictions based on age, criminal conviction, disability, and local residency.