Hungary vs Marshall Islands: Men's universal right to vote
Hungary
1
in 2025
Marshall Islands
1
in 2025
Hungary rank
1st
Marshall Islands rank
1st
Men's universal right to vote over time
- Hungary
- Marshall Islands
How they compare
Hungary currently reports 1 against 1 in Marshall Islands, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 151 shared years of data; in 1875 it was Marshall Islands ahead.
Hungary ranks 1st and Marshall Islands ranks 1st of 198 countries.
Hungary has averaged higher in every one of the 16 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Hungary | Marshall Islands | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1870s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1880s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1890s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1900s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1910s | 0.1 | 0 | 0.1 | Hungary |
| 1920s | 0.2 | 0 | 0.2 | Hungary |
| 1930s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1940s | 0.5 | 0 | 0.5 | Hungary |
| 1950s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1960s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1970s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1980s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1990s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2000s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2020s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher men's universal right to vote, Hungary or Marshall Islands?
- Hungary, at 1 against 1 in Marshall Islands as of 2025.
- What is the difference in men's universal right to vote between Hungary and Marshall Islands?
- 0, with Hungary ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Hungary and Marshall Islands?
- 151 years are reported by both, from 1875 to 2025.
- How do Hungary and Marshall Islands rank globally for men's universal right to vote?
- Hungary ranks 1st and Marshall Islands ranks 1st of 198 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Men's universal right to vote. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Indicates whether all men are allowed to vote in national elections. It neither considers informal restrictions nor legal restrictions based on age, criminal conviction, disability, and local residency.