Hungary vs San Marino: Men's universal right to vote
Hungary
1
in 2025
San Marino
1
in 2025
Hungary rank
1st
San Marino rank
1st
Men's universal right to vote over time
- Hungary
- San Marino
How they compare
Hungary currently reports 1 against 1 in San Marino, a difference of 0.
Across all 159 years both countries report, San Marino has been ahead every year.
Hungary ranks 1st and San Marino ranks 1st of 198 countries.
San Marino has averaged higher in every one of the 17 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Hungary | San Marino | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1860s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1870s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1880s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1890s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1900s | 0 | 0.1 | 0.1 | San Marino |
| 1910s | 0.1 | 1 | 0.9 | San Marino |
| 1920s | 0.2 | 1 | 0.8 | San Marino |
| 1930s | 0 | 1 | 1 | San Marino |
| 1940s | 0.5 | 1 | 0.5 | San Marino |
| 1950s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1960s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1970s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1980s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1990s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2000s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2020s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher men's universal right to vote, Hungary or San Marino?
- Hungary, at 1 against 1 in San Marino as of 2025.
- What is the difference in men's universal right to vote between Hungary and San Marino?
- 0, with Hungary ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Hungary and San Marino?
- 159 years are reported by both, from 1867 to 2025.
- How do Hungary and San Marino rank globally for men's universal right to vote?
- Hungary ranks 1st and San Marino ranks 1st of 198 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Men's universal right to vote. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Indicates whether all men are allowed to vote in national elections. It neither considers informal restrictions nor legal restrictions based on age, criminal conviction, disability, and local residency.