Iceland vs Sri Lanka: Men's universal right to vote
Iceland
1
in 2025
Sri Lanka
1
in 2025
Iceland rank
1st
Sri Lanka rank
1st
Men's universal right to vote over time
- Iceland
- Sri Lanka
How they compare
Iceland currently reports 1 against 1 in Sri Lanka, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 182 shared years of data; in 1844 it was Sri Lanka ahead.
Iceland ranks 1st and Sri Lanka ranks 1st of 198 countries.
Iceland has averaged higher in every one of the 19 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Iceland | Sri Lanka | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1840s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1850s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1860s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1870s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1880s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1890s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1900s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1910s | 0.5 | 0 | 0.5 | Iceland |
| 1920s | 1 | 0 | 1 | Iceland |
| 1930s | 1 | 0.8 | 0.2 | Iceland |
| 1940s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1950s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1960s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1970s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1980s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1990s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2000s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2020s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher men's universal right to vote, Iceland or Sri Lanka?
- Iceland, at 1 against 1 in Sri Lanka as of 2025.
- What is the difference in men's universal right to vote between Iceland and Sri Lanka?
- 0, with Iceland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Iceland and Sri Lanka?
- 182 years are reported by both, from 1844 to 2025.
- How do Iceland and Sri Lanka rank globally for men's universal right to vote?
- Iceland ranks 1st and Sri Lanka ranks 1st of 198 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Men's universal right to vote. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Indicates whether all men are allowed to vote in national elections. It neither considers informal restrictions nor legal restrictions based on age, criminal conviction, disability, and local residency.