India vs Monaco: Men's universal right to vote
India
1
in 2025
Monaco
1
in 2025
India rank
1st
Monaco rank
1st
Men's universal right to vote over time
- India
- Monaco
How they compare
India currently reports 1 against 1 in Monaco, a difference of 0.
Across all 212 years both countries report, Monaco has been ahead every year.
India ranks 1st and Monaco ranks 1st of 198 countries.
Monaco has averaged higher in every one of the 22 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | India | Monaco | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1810s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1820s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1830s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1840s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1850s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1860s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1870s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1880s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1890s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1900s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1910s | 0 | 0.5 | 0.5 | Monaco |
| 1920s | 0 | 1 | 1 | Monaco |
| 1930s | 0 | 1 | 1 | Monaco |
| 1940s | 0 | 1 | 1 | Monaco |
| 1950s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1960s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1970s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1980s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1990s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2000s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2020s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher men's universal right to vote, India or Monaco?
- India, at 1 against 1 in Monaco as of 2025.
- What is the difference in men's universal right to vote between India and Monaco?
- 0, with India ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for India and Monaco?
- 212 years are reported by both, from 1814 to 2025.
- How do India and Monaco rank globally for men's universal right to vote?
- India ranks 1st and Monaco ranks 1st of 198 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Men's universal right to vote. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Indicates whether all men are allowed to vote in national elections. It neither considers informal restrictions nor legal restrictions based on age, criminal conviction, disability, and local residency.