North Korea vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Men's universal right to vote
North Korea
1
in 2025
Saint Kitts and Nevis
1
in 2025
North Korea rank
1st
Saint Kitts and Nevis rank
1st
Men's universal right to vote over time
- North Korea
- Saint Kitts and Nevis
How they compare
North Korea currently reports 1 against 1 in Saint Kitts and Nevis, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 78 shared years of data; in 1948 it was North Korea ahead.
North Korea ranks 1st and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 1st of 198 countries.
North Korea has averaged higher in every one of the 9 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | North Korea | Saint Kitts and Nevis | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1940s | 1 | 0 | 1 | North Korea |
| 1950s | 1 | 0.8 | 0.2 | North Korea |
| 1960s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1970s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1980s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1990s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2000s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2020s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher men's universal right to vote, North Korea or Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- North Korea, at 1 against 1 in Saint Kitts and Nevis as of 2025.
- What is the difference in men's universal right to vote between North Korea and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- 0, with North Korea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for North Korea and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- 78 years are reported by both, from 1948 to 2025.
- How do North Korea and Saint Kitts and Nevis rank globally for men's universal right to vote?
- North Korea ranks 1st and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 1st of 198 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Men's universal right to vote. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Indicates whether all men are allowed to vote in national elections. It neither considers informal restrictions nor legal restrictions based on age, criminal conviction, disability, and local residency.