Kuwait vs Laos: Men's universal right to vote
Kuwait
1
in 2025
Laos
1
in 2025
Kuwait rank
1st
Laos rank
1st
Men's universal right to vote over time
- Kuwait
- Laos
How they compare
Kuwait currently reports 1 against 1 in Laos, a difference of 0.
Across all 237 years both countries report, Laos has been ahead every year.
Kuwait ranks 1st and Laos ranks 1st of 198 countries.
Laos has averaged higher in every one of the 25 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kuwait | Laos | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1780s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1790s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1800s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1810s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1820s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1830s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1840s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1850s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1860s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1870s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1880s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1890s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1900s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1910s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1920s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1930s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1940s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1950s | 0 | 0.4 | 0.4 | Laos |
| 1960s | 0.9 | 1 | 0.1 | Laos |
| 1970s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1980s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1990s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2000s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2020s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher men's universal right to vote, Kuwait or Laos?
- Kuwait, at 1 against 1 in Laos as of 2025.
- What is the difference in men's universal right to vote between Kuwait and Laos?
- 0, with Kuwait ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kuwait and Laos?
- 237 years are reported by both, from 1789 to 2025.
- How do Kuwait and Laos rank globally for men's universal right to vote?
- Kuwait ranks 1st and Laos ranks 1st of 198 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Lexical Index (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Men's universal right to vote. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Indicates whether all men are allowed to vote in national elections. It neither considers informal restrictions nor legal restrictions based on age, criminal conviction, disability, and local residency.